Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
September 19, 2013
Image Size
22.0 KB
Resolution
1011×529
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,256
Favourites
26 (who?)
Comments
17
×
M213 Terminator Support vehicle by CrimsonFALKE M213 Terminator Support vehicle by CrimsonFALKE
When Russia got its hands on the M213 it decided that the vehicle was in need of additional fire power. Looking to its mid 21st century technology and the Federation's M143 40mm Gauss gun the Russians made the next generation of terminators with an unmanned turret twin Gauss guns and four anti armor missiles.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconemilion-3:
Emilion-3 Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
IMpressive.
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thank you
Reply
:iconemilion-3:
Emilion-3 Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Your welcome.
Reply
:icondrakenhothrepublik:
DrakenhothRepublik Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Interestings. :o
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thanks
Reply
:iconarmamentdawg:
ArmamentDawg Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2013
Looks good, and similar enough to the BMPT to silence armchair generals who may otherwise dismiss the design as a ten-year-old's doodle. (No offense intended. When I look at the model kits that Games Workshop make for their 'Warhammer 40,000' games, I keep thinking, "That looks f***ing retarded! No real-world army would deploy an armored vehicle that looks like a self-propelled coffin or funerary urn!")
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Warhammer40K oh god tell me how in the name of fuck warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/Ch… is this better than an M2bradley
Reply
:iconarmamentdawg:
ArmamentDawg Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2013

It carries more passengers. Overall, I think the Chimera is an acceptable design- I won't choose it over the M2 Bradley, but I will choose it over the M113.

 

My main problem is with the Land Raider. First, the designers forgot why the first tanks were shaped the way they did- to cross trenches- and reversed the rhomboid tracks to look cool. This means if the Land Raider has to cross a trench, the reversed tracks will make it bury its nose into the ground, like a giant metal ostrich, and become immobilized.

 

Then the designers forgot why the first tanks had sponson-mounted weapons- a cannon-armed turret would make the Mark I dangerously top-heavy- and decided to sacrifice the many advantages a rotating turret offers. They even managed to design sponsons inferior to the World War I tank! The Land Raider's laser cannons have exposed cables, meaning shrapnel and stray shots will quickly render the weapons useless- assuming they're not already, what with hanging branches tearing at the cables, lying rocks getting knocked up in the air and down the servomotors, causing notable damage BEFORE the tank reaches the battlefield. What's more, each sponson mounts a single weapon- it doesn't mount two laser cannons, it mounts a "twin-linked" laser cannon, meaning it counts as a single weapon, can only be fired at a single target, and damage to one component will automatically render the others useless!

 

And this is supposedly so awesome a tank, the Emperor reserved its use for His best soldiers?

Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
The Chimera is at ground level of all thinks how does that help in combat? The Landrader is like all of the 40K things over sized tropes that are total crap. The entire universe is a rip off of Issac Asimov's world of the Empire of mankind.
Reply
:icononi-defense:
ONI-Defense Featured By Owner Sep 20, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
:iconputinplz: Obama, you call this hunk of junk an armed vehicle? Here, I add twin 40mm Gauss cannons and anti armor missiles. See, better.
Reply
Add a Comment: