In New Delhi, the Jawahar Lal Nehru University, JNU, is a strong bastion of communists. Many of its professors have strong violent left-wing orientation. This place is also a hotbed of radical feminism. Khurshid Anwar, aged 55, is a former student of JNU and he a communist, who used to run a Non-Government Organization known as the Institute for Social Democracy. He was a male feminist and just like other male feminists, all through his life he never bothered about false allegations of rape and their possible impact on the innocent men, who are accused. In fact, he may have even believed that the percentage of false allegations are miniscule or less than 2% and hence not worth any attention, which is the standard Feminist line. I am sorry but I have not seen anything to prove contrary.
After an incident of rape of a young women one a bus in Delhi, violent protests broke out in Delhi, as many people read in the international news. Khurshid Anwar, his NGO, and his fellow comrades organized some of the most wide spread violent riots in India's History.
On 18th December, less than 1 year after the protests that Kurshid Anwar organised, he committed suicide by jumping from his building, after the media started flashing news that he allegedly raped a young female colleague, working in another NGO. The alleged incident happened in the month of September in his house, where some members of an NGO had organised a party.
His dead body was taken to Communist Party headquarters in New Delhi. The communist journalists and feminists then started claiming “trial by media.”He had a party at his house and a woman remained after the party without his knowledge or permission she later said he raped her and there was no evidence to support her claim. That didn't mean he was innocent in fact he was guilty. Why well the Indian communists and feminist NGOs, had campaigned for decades for draconian to say the least rape laws, which leave no scope for an innocent man to prove his innocence during the investigation stage. There is no presumption of innocence. This group is now facing the age old dilemma "careful what you wish for you might just get it."
His his final letter reads, "Now after all this, those members of the NGO I knew beforehand refuse to acknowledge me. They have deflected the fight somewhere else and are now enjoying the show. What is my fault in this? Shouldn't the rest have at least asked me once what had happened?"
As much as I would like to say and enjoy "the sweet taste of Irony" yes it’s rude yes its funny, even though I care for his ideals he was a man with human rights entitled to everyone as human beings. I am going to treat this like a demoralizing violation of a man's rights as a person worthy of a fair trial. His feminist/communist buddies fucked up and are trying to blame everyone but themselves. I mean they threw huge riots to make a draconian state and now their little 1984 is biting them in the ass. Its a classic case of people being stupid enough to sacrifice their freedoms in the name of safety. In the end you have neither.