Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
:iconcrimsonfalke:CrimsonFALKE posted a status
Why China's empire is doomed to fail. It can't make its own weapons. Instead it steals them over and over again making bootleg copies. The J31 and J20 oddly the carrier that they will fly from is a cold war left over from the Ukraine. Its wealth is generated through CCP slave labor camps. Steve Jobs is probably burning in hell for making those things.

Devious Comments

:iconjb1992:
JB1992 Featured By Owner Mar 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I have one for you:

The Chinese "Type 730 CIWS": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_730…
It's basically a bootleg copy of the Dutch "Goalkeeper CIWS": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goalkeep…

Apart form that, the main gun system on the Chinese type 730 CIWS, The "H/PJ-12" is also a bootleg copy of the american made GAU-8 Avenger 30mm...
The Dutch Goalkeeper CIWS has an American GAU-8/A Avanger, so we can see the similarity's

The Dutch Goalkeeper was designed and developed during 1975/1980, the Chinese somewhere during 1987/1990 I believe, The Dutch system was based around the 30 mm 7-barreled GAU-8 Avanger Gatling gun, for very specific reasons...
these reasons are sort of the problem why the Chinese system is in the long term run going to be a failure...The reason why we had chosen to buy the GAU-8 over the 20mm variant from General electric was because of the development of
specific 30mm missile-piercing ammunition, and a special Radar detection system for use in this Gatling gun system, the Ammunition was developed in Belgium which wasn't a success in the long run if I can recall, 
(because of failures in the munition design) so the job was transferred a German company that succeeded, The GAU-8 Avanger in the CIWS configuration fires 30×173mm PGU-14/B API, PGU-13/B HE-I, APDS-T, FMPDS,
with MPDS K164 FMPDS K165 
being the special made ammunition, its unknown if the ammunition is also copied but you can probably bet on that...

now to compensate in trajectory, tracking accuracy, and overheating the GAU-8 fires not at max rate, it has some specific rates for what ammunition is being feed in the system, especially for the MPDS and FMPDS shells,
what ammunition is fed in the system is mostly defined by the shape and size of the incoming missile, this targeting fine tuning of the system is done during joined operations with the US navy, (last year there were some)
and is sometimes done during joined training missions, or on land in the United states of America on a land based CIWS test site were the Phalanx "sea-whiz" (Was) or is also tested to coop with new radar systems,
basically the system is tuned and calibrated for new types of missiles and there signatures, this fine tuning is very specific to this CIWS system that is being tuned (the GAU-8 Avanger, in particular) and the special Ammunition,
So I can't see how this copycat Chinese system is going to compensate for that... and that's probably also why the radar and tracking suite is totally diffident form this system, (it seems copying that was a bit to hard...) 
its probably because the Dutch CIWS system is double and in some cases triple implemented, with a Double radar detection an targeting systems running simultaneously, and in some cases in a triple simultaneous run implementation,
were the CIWS itself has a radar suite in closed loop but it can also use the ships secondary simultaneously running AUX systems, or a collective radar system from multiple ships from different NATO country's  for wider detection.
instead of copying all that, the Chinese system uses a singular closed loop system of radar, imaging and tracking that is installed on the CIWS itself, and thus its confined to the accuracy of the systems installed in the closed loop.
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Mar 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I doubt they have the know how to actually make the complexe system of which you speak. Between unique ammunition and feed systems the radar being able to track changing tracking systems of incoming targets is simply to hard to follow.
Reply
:iconjb1992:
JB1992 Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Well, the Dutch Navy works together very "narrowly" with the US navy on these type of systems, given the unique Ammunition and specific fine tuning and compensations involved in the GAU-8 Avanger,
its sort of impossible to copy that development put into the GAU-8 system that is still tweaked, You see most of the fine tuning of the GAU-8 is based around the that specific gun system an its mechanics,
Now the Chinese might have copied the GAU-8 in its design and created the "H/PJ-12", but it wont function or behave like the original GAU-8, so the ammunition (if its also copied) will probably not
behave in the same manner in there system, having different chamber pressures and different heat statistics from the GAU-8, its just not going to work the same...
Which is one of the the big flaws of the type 730 CIWS , apart from that it hasn't got the sophisticated radar tracking system to go along with the gun system, the development of the Dutch goalkeeper CIWS 
was kind of the same as the development of the A-10 warthog, you have a gun and you build a system around it, like the A-10 warthog is build around the GAU-8, the Dutch CIWS and radar tracking systems,
and all other systems are build around the GAU-8, not the H/PJ-12...
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Indeed its a good system the dutch have sadly Obama's 8 year run was fucking awful for US security.
Reply
:iconjb1992:
JB1992 Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Well luckily there is Trump, he pressured us and all of the NATO country's to pay up (with good reasons).
Why our politics had budget cut the hell out of it is beyond me.

Talking about it, we have elections within a week here in Holland, so all candidates have presented there plans and opinions, but what's funny is how our neo liberal politicians
held up high that we couldn't spend much more on the army and navy and NATO (for some reason there was no budget in there political plans, and they never really explained why) 
and all of the sudden Trump speaks the trued about NATO spending, even showing statistics and out of the blue there's spontaneously a budget available in every leading politician
its election plans... like Wtf.

And that's exactly why we need Trump to tell us, if someone else had done it, it would've probably gone unnoticed.
I actually find it unfair that the USA has to pay up more because of country's not paying up,
like what good is an agreed upon expenditure model if nobody is going comply with it.
 
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Frankly I have a feeling that a western collapse was wanted by the elite to simply roll over and play dead for their Chinese and/or Muslim backers. Frankly NATO has to pay its fair share I mean Germany can sure as shit afford to pay or lend other nations money its leadership is stupid but the money is there. Frankly I can't see why it is so taboo for the US to say you all have to pay a fair share. I mean the US can't dominate NATO nor should it, why can't the other members get an equal portion of responsibility. 
Reply
:iconjb1992:
JB1992 Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
yes I have no Idee really, Indeed the US should not dominate all of NATO but it seems like they wanted us to believe so, 
the media at least tells us this, basically upholding this taboo.

I just found it Amusing when Trump said and pointed out the simple facts that all of the sudden money was available...
It feels corrupt you know, I really hope it isn't tho...
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Sadly I just hope you guys can get your swamp drained like we are.
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment: